17 Dec
USC 2010 Football Season in Review
USC football was very different this year and it goes beyond the change in coaching staff. The energy around the team was different..had a different vibe. Let’s face it, we expected a tough season. For the first time in a long time, we went into games such as Oregon and Stanford and expected to lose and would be happy if it was a close loss. It goes beyond the change in coaching staff because USC still had and has a ton of talent but very little depth. The players were poorly coached the last couple of season prior to 2010 and thus we knew they would struggle. Compound that with a new coaching staff and you have the 2010 season. I wonder if coach Kiffin would have taken his “Dream Job” if he knew then what he knows now. Pete did him no favors with his lazy recruiting and poorly selections in assistant coaches the last couple of years in his USC coaching career. The lack of depth falls directly on coach Carroll.
Offense:
The offense started off pretty good and seemed to get better each week. Barkely was playing much better and the running game was strong. The offense was getting yards in big chunks and putting up alot of points. They were doing so well that in the Oregon game I thought the offense could actually keep up with the ducks. Well, the offense did keep up with the ducks for about 2.5 quarters and then it hit a wall….Hard….and never recovered. Barkely regressed big time. The Notre Dame game was the low point of the season for the offense. A bad defense looked like the Steelers Iron Curtain. It got to a point where I thougth a turn over by the defense was not enough….they needed to get the turn over and score because the offense could do nothing. 5 false starts in that game! The offense needs alot of work and it starts with the play calling. Coach Kiffin needs to make mid season adjustments. The players need to play to their potential an execute the game plan.
Grade: C
Defense:
The defense started off as bad as any defense I have ever seen in my life. There was poor tackling and poor decisions. The worst part was the play calling and schemes. Guys were WIDE open, the hole for the running backs were HUGE. The middle of the field was always WIDE open. This unit improved immensely and was actually pretty good towards the end of the season. They were forcing a ton of turn overs. Unfortunately, they could still not stop a game winning drive. This unit has a ton of depth issues. The front seven needs alot of bodies. I was happy to see the improvement but I am nervous about the future.
Grade: C
Special Teams:
They had some great moments with Woods returning kicks but the kicking game is bad. Your kicker cannot make a field goal past 25 yards. The two point conversions were BAD! Why go for so many? The two point attempt against ucla was embrassing. Up and down season for special teams.
Grade: C-
Coaching
Coach Kiffin and his staff came into a tough situation. For the first half of the season I thought they did an outstanding job considering the circumstances. Keeping the team motivated and playing hard the whole game. Last season you saw players give up Pete Carroll. The standford game comes to mind in particular. That team gave up. However, the 2010 team that had less to play for never did. The closet they came to giving up was the Oregon State game. For the most part these are the same players from last season. That says alot about the coaching staff and the great job by coach Kiffin. That being said, I think coach Kiffin still has a long ways to go as a coach. He is a young guy and lacks the experience of coaching in different situations, it goes beyond X’s and O’s. It is a feel for the season, the players and moods. That only comes from experience, so we might have to suffer through his maturing process. However, he needs to get an experienced OC. Someone that knows about midgame, midseason adjustments.
As for the defense, the jury is still out on Monte. Yes, he is a legend in the NFL and re-invented defense with his tampa 2 scheme. The key word is “NFL”. Alot of NFL legends came down to the collegiate level and did not display the genius they displayed in the NFL. Bill Walsh comes to mind at Standford. We have seen 2 season of Monte on the college level. One at Tennessee and one at USC. Neither season was impressive. Obviously it takes time to adjust to the college level and for the players to learn the system. The question is…is the NFL Tampa 2 defense suitable for the college level? Can a 70+ year old coach adjust his schemes and coaching methods and make the transition from dealing with men to dealing with kids???
Grade: B
…Last Note on Carrol
The ESPN 30 for 30 episode on the Pony Express (SMU) and the story of how that school got the death penalty was very good. I though it was funny that right after it debuted ESPN showed the Heisman ceremony with Cam Newton winning considering all the allegations around him. However, I was disappointed that when the show finished and was rolling the credits they were showing clips of more recent pay for play scandals….and of course USC and Reggie were featured. Pete Carroll did not look good in those clips. I thinking it goes to show that his tenure will be forever tarnished. He was great and will be remembered for this great accomplishments but his legacy will be tarnished. The longer USC takes to bounce back from sanctions the more his legacy will be tarnished. Carroll should be Kiffin’s biggest supporter to save that legacy. Carroll went from the Tom Osbourne, Ara Parseghian realm of coaches to the Barry Switzer realm of coaches. Sad really. A friend of mine who is a fanatical support of Carroll refuses to lay the blame of the scandal on Pete and instead insists that it was Garretts fault. I do not take any of the blame away from Garrett but the Carroll is the man in charge of the football program. The scandal falls at his feet.
The Trojans lost another heart breaker last night. The offense played great and has improved significantly since the start the first game of the season. Matt Barkley has followed his poorest games of the games of the season with two of his best. The penalties on the offense side has been becoming less of an issue as the season progress. Most importantly I think Kiffin has grown as an offensive coordinator. He has taken what the defense gives him. Against Washington…he decided to ride Bradford and he had a career day. Knowing Stanford was better against the run he decided to ride Barkley and Woods and they had a career day. That is smart coaching. The biggest evidence of Kiffins maturity as a play caller came on a play that was not successful. Kiffin ran the wildcat over and over again…sometimes with success and sometimes with no success. However, in a crucial part of the game…he went into the wildcat formation and passed to an open Havilli. He dropped it but it was a great call set up on game long. The offense has played well enough to be 6-0…the defense..huh! not so much.
I think that the penalties were very harsh considering the evidence. The question was did USC know or should have known. Maybe they should have known when they saw Reggie’s parents at the bowl games staying in expensive hotels…the NCAA says that high profile athlete’s require that much more attention but has always said that every athlete should be treated the same. I will point out that although USC gets compared to Miami and Alabama in punishment…those schools involved boosters which are directly tied to the school. Charles Woodson who won the Heisman at Michigan..and Chris Webber who played basketball at UM admitted in court under oath that they took over 300k in payments from boosters while at UM..the punishment was not even close to USC.








