4
Jan
Posted by admin in Life in General, Professional Life, Software Engineering | Tags :engineering, linkedin, Software Architect | No Comments |
I don’t make resolutions but rather I set goals for myself at the start of the year. I do not always achieve them all but this year I am determined to get to as close as 100% as possible. I am making these public so that I can have more accountability….Here we go with the goals for 2010…
Professional:
IEEE CSDP Certification – Took the test in Dec…Find out the results in Feb
Sun Certified Java Programmer
Sun Certified Web Component Developer
Microsoft Certified Professional Developer (MCPD)
Maybe – Microsoft Certified Database Administrator (MCDBA)
ACE ColdFusion -
Ambitious I know but I think definiatly doable. I feel this will certify my “Application Architect” Title
Sports:
Pasadena Tri in March
WildFlower Half Ironman in May
Mudrun in June
Tri in August
Muddy Buddy in November
Wildflower is the big one….
There it is…wish me luck!
8
Nov
Posted by admin in Software Engineering | Tags :engineering, linkedin, software, Software Architect, Software Engineering | 3 Comments |
I had the privilege to work for a company that practiced the very definition of software engineering. We were exposed to the complete software development life cycle. I also had the honor of working with and learning from some very intelligent senior software engineers. I have a tremendous amount of respect for my former manager. I would really like to use him and his approach to software engineering and software management as a template for my career. He had a pet peeve about calling ourselves programmers. I can still see him now pounding his fist on his desk whenever one of us called ourselves a programmer. He insisted that anyone can write code but a software engineer understands the SDLC and the core principles of software engineering. That has always stuck in my head. More so when I started to develop more complex web applications with different programming languages on the web platform.
Programming languages are tools that implement and adhere to the core fundamentals of object orientated software development. Programming languages for the web platform are no different. I started with web programming in 1998 and back then object oriented design for the web was unheard of…not anymore. As more software goes to the web the programming languages become more and more like traditional object orientated languages. If a software engineer understands the fundamentals of software engineering he can easily pick up any of these languages.
That is why I have been surprised as to potential employers requiring tests on specific frameworks or programming languages in order to gauge the knowledge of the potential employee. I recently took two tests as part of my application process and I really did not understand the point. Before anyone assumes that I am complaining because I bombed the tests….the first test was on .Net 3.0 and I got called for my second interview the next day. So apparently I performed well on the test. The second test was on ColdFusion MX 7. I was told at the time I scored the highest on the test.
However, I do not think they were anyway true measures of my skills or talent as a software engineer. Questions such as “What component would you use if you were presenting a user with a calendar” or “Name the upgrades from ColdFusion 6 to Coldfusion 7″ do not tell the hiring manager anything about my abilities as a software engineer. With these types of questions I would fail a “CNext” test and I worked with that framework for 11 years.
In the end, I find it ironic that people are looking for “Software Engineers” and trying to screen them out with these tests especially in the web development. The web is still the wild wild west..with new frameworks and programming lanagages coming out every year. But all these still follow the core fundementals of software engineering..So I would think that hiring mangers would want to hire someone that understands this and can quickly learn the tools (programmin lanagues) rather than a “programmer” that can become obsolete as his programming lanaguge of choice becomes obsolete.